Dating methods stone tools
For example, beads closely resembling those from the temple repositories at Cnoss and dating from C.1600 B.C were found in a late context (Period V) at Harappa. By noting the association of these beads it has been possible to trace a archaeological datum line across Indian sub-continent and Mesopotamia.However this formula has not been accepted by many archaeologists.
This closely agrees with the fact that the seals from Indus Valley style from Ur, Kish and Tell Asmar and other sites fall within the range of 2500-1500 B. When a group or type of objects are found together under circumstances suggesting contemporanity they are said to be associated.
It is nearly always association with other phenomena that gives a first clue as to the use, the age and chronological attribution of a potential datum, but age at least may sometimes be inferred from position in a geological deposit or a layer of peat.
Whenever and where ever such antiquities are found, associated finds are automatically dated.
For example Mauryan terracottas, Roman amphorae, Harappan pottery, NBP , PGW,etc.
Charred bones are better preserved and are therefore relatively more reliable.